[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:50:53 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 02 Feb 2021, Ergus wrote:
1) In general `C-x g` is used by magit; I know this is not a
priority (cause magit is an external package), but magit is a
very popular package.
While Magit is indeed very popular and valuable, shouldn't it
still adhere to convention and avoid binding things in the `C-x'
space?
That's really a point to be made on the Magit development mailing
list, not here, but what I'm saying here is that Emacs shouldn't
make special efforts to avoid interfering with package keybindings
that violate Emacs's conventions anyway.
Magit should instead suggest `C-c g' as an entry point for
`magit-status', though a user can bind it however they want of course.
I doubt there are any Magit users who would be daunted by the need to
set up a keybinding for Magit's entry point.
Best regards,
-Karl
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/13
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/07
- Re: Concern about new binding., Jean Louis, 2021/02/12
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Jean Louis, 2021/02/12
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/12
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Jean Louis, 2021/02/12
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Joost Kremers, 2021/02/04
RE: [External] : Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding.,
Karl Fogel <=
Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Karl Fogel, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/02