[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:50:07 +0100 |
>>>>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:37:07 +0000, Gregory Heytings
>>>>> <gregory@heytings.org> said:
>>> In a recent commit I see that the C-x g binding was taken for
>>> revert-buffer.
>>
>> I see another disadvantage in that binding: revert-buffer is a
>> drastic operation, so we should not make it easier. I think it is
>> wiser not to put it on a key -- which is why I never did.
>>
Gregory> It's true that it is a drastic operation, but it asks for
Gregory> confirmation, and it can be undone. An additional security measure
Gregory> would be to disable it by default: (put 'revert-buffer 'disabled
t).
Please no, itʼs a useful operation in some situations, making it more
confusing for people to use is not a good idea.
Compromise binding: "C-x G", which doesnʼt clash with magit, and is
relatively hard to type by accident.
Robert
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
Re: Concern about new binding., martin rudalics, 2021/02/03
Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Yuan Fu, 2021/02/03