[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:46:16 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> As for the conventions, as far as I can tell, they explicitly require
> to steer clear of "C-c letter", but they don't have anything about
> "C-x letter":
>
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Key-Binding-Conventions.html
That's true. It isn't necessarily bad for a package to bind C-xLETTER.
However, binding any of the remaining C-x LETTER keys is a digificant
change, A package which binds one should be prepared to see that
key get an important global binding, which would not quite compel
a change in the package, but almost.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Invoking Magit (was: Concern about new binding), (continued)
Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Karl Fogel, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding.,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., Ergus, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., martin rudalics, 2021/02/03