[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current mode command discovery
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Current mode command discovery |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:44:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Hm... that's certainly a wrinkle here. On the other hand,
>> `C-h f digit-argument' would work as always.
>
> Is "C-h x" the only command to use this, in addition to M-x?
I don't know.
> "C-h x" is a command we introduced for newbies, and then we proceed
> confusing them with commands that cannot be shown with "C-h x"? is
> that reasonable and consistent?
Filtering away `undefined' and `ignore' from completions for newbies
sounds like a good idea to me: They aren't commands that can be used in
`M-x'.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Current mode command discovery, (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Richard Stallman, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/21
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21