Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands

[Jonas Bernoulli]

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:

> Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:
>
>>> What are your thoughts about the discussion of including it in Emacs?
>>> I think having it built-in would be a huge benefit.
>>
>> I would prefer the "bundled elpa package" approach over adding the
>> package to emacs.git itself, but don't know if that feature is already
>> usable.
>
> Since transient is a single elisp file, the simplest approach is to put
> it in emacs.git under lisp, and enter it in elpa as a :core package.
> Then emacs.git is the upstream development repo.

Plus transient.texi.
Does that change anything?

> The proposed policy for bundled elpa packages is that core emacs code
> may not depend on them; on the other hand, core emacs code may depend on
> :core elpa packages.

Well that decides it then; core it is.