[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggested experimental test
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Suggested experimental test |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:06:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
> Well... the suggested experiment does not remove C-o, it changes C-o
> in a way that is, I believe, painless.
Sorry; I didn't read the patch carefully. So it basically moves `C-o'
to `C-o C-o' (and makes the `C-o' prefix open for new commands)?
I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this
would be annoying or not for users. Any `C-o' users who have an opinion
here?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Re: Suggested experimental test, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/21
Re: Sv: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: Suggested experimental test, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Richard Stallman, 2021/03/23
Re: Suggested experimental test, Jean Louis, 2021/03/22
Re: Suggested experimental test, Robin Tarsiger, 2021/03/22