Re: [partially solved]

[Tassilo Horn]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> ,----
>>> | Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Error loading autoloads: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Unable to activate package ‘texfrag’.
>>> | Required package ‘auctex-11.90.2’ is unavailable
>>> | Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Eager macro-expansion failure: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Error loading autoloads: (wrong-number-of-arguments (3 . 4) 2)
>>> | Unable to activate package ‘bibretrieve’.
>>> | Required package ‘auctex-11.87’ is unavailable
>>> | Unable to activate package ‘auctex-latexmk’.
>>> | Required package ‘auctex-11.87’ is unavailable
>>> | 
>>> `----
>
> Any chance you're running a somewhat old AUCTeX version?

When looking at bibretrieve at MELPA

  https://melpa.org/#/bibretrieve

it depends on auctex-11.87 which is from around 2014.  Same for the
auctex-latexmk package from

  https://melpa.org/#/auctex-latexmk

The texfrag package at MELPA

  https://melpa.org/#/texfrag

depends on auctex-11.90.2.  So I guess the auctex versions popping up
there are the minimal versions required by some package.

I know we've had some `make-obsolete' calls where the WHEN argument was
missing which produced a `wrong-number-of-arguments' error in at least
the current emacs master but those are all fixed in auctex 13.0.x (not
sure which x but definitely for x in {8,9}).

Maybe the errors come from something different.  AUCTeX 13 has some
incompatible changes because we've migrated it to `lexical-binding',
possibly including signature changes where there is now a different
arity.

Bye,
Tassilo