[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45 |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Oct 2021 09:14:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Steingold <sds@gnu.org> writes:
> See if subr.ell has changed (the compiler should not change subr.ell
> unless necessary, including the timestamp).
Right, because the subr.ell only contains macros (and the like). So the
suggestion here is basically the same as mine, only with a lot more
files spread around.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, (continued)
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/04
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/04
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/04
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/05
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/05
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Adam Porter, 2021/10/05
- Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/05
Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Steingold, 2021/10/04
Re: More reliable byte compilation, take 45, Steingold, 2021/10/05