|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re: Shorthands have landed on master) |
Date: | Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:21:35 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I don't think it's natural at all. A most common case of me is doing a > C-h f from within the *Help* buffer itself, Then there won't be any read-symbol-shorthands installed and you won't be affected either way. > to find another related function. Should I keep track of where all > the C-h f chains started to use those shorthands in those C-h > f searches? That's madness, at least for me. I don't think anyone suggested tracking such chains. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |