Re: character sets as they relate to “Raw†string literals for elisp

[Stefan Kangas]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> We are currently talking about providing infrastructure for
> translation.  As long as there's no such infrastructure, talking about
> translations and their quality is not useful.

We have translations in etc/tutorials and etc/refcards.

> Yes, translation of program messages is hard, and there are many bad
> translations.  But it is not impossible to produce good translations.

I don't recall having used the word "impossible".  It seems to me that
we agree on this point.

> No one seriously talks about translating all our documentation.

That's good.