[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs
|
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
|
Subject: |
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs |
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:44:15 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii [2021-10-08 14:21 +0300] wrote:
> Btw, "close NNN XX.YY" doesn't mark the bug as "done", see
WFM: https://bugs.gnu.org/51076#11
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51029#8 as one example.
That bug was later reopened in https://bugs.gnu.org/51029#16.
But I feel like I've run into a "closed but not done" issue once before,
so maybe there's a bug under certain conditions.
--
Basil
- Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Glenn Morris, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/08
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs,
Basil L. Contovounesios <=