[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:41:15 +0300 |
> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:10:50 +0300
>
> >> I think this inconsistency is unfortunate and unjustified. Can we
> >> please move same-window-prefix to "C-x 4 5" for consistency with the
> >> equivalent frame command?
> >
> > Sorry, I meant "C-x 4 4" and other-window-prefix.
>
> Please explain where do you think is inconsistency.
> 'C-x 4 4' is already bound to 'other-window-prefix'.
But other-frame-prefix is "C-x 5 5". This is inconsistent with other
uses of these prefixes, specifically "C-x 5 2", "C-x 5 b", C-x 5 f",
which have their "C-x 4" counterparts.
- "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/09
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/09
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Daniel Martín, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Juri Linkov, 2021/10/11
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/10/11
- Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/11