[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA: new package coterm
From: |
miha |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA: new package coterm |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:22:27 +0200 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> miha@kamnitnik.top writes:
>
>> There is a lot of duplicated functionality with term.el. For
>> information on the differences from [M-x term] and why I didn't reuse
>> term.el functions, see the commentary section and the comment at the
>> start of ";;; Terminal emulation" section.
>
> Is there any reason this shouldn't be added to shell or comint directly?
>
It is actually my plan on the long run to eventually convert this
package to a patch for comint (and maybe eshell, who knows). But as it
is now, I don't think it's quite ready for that yet. I do believe,
however, that it's usable enough to be published as a package. This
way, others can use it without having to wait for an Emacs release and
perhaps report problems and help in development.
Best regards.
> --
> Philip Kaludercic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature