Re: Moving kbd to subr.el

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:

> Lars -- I agree in principle, but I think the details matter; let's
> rephrase as "We dont need to or even *shouldn't* plan to support *every*
> syntactic nuance used by kbd".
>
> Many of the weird corner cases that kbd supports --- likely mostly by
> accident --- will never be typed by users in their emacs configuration.

Oh, no -- we're aiming for the syntax defined by `kdb-valid-p', which is
a small subset of the stuff that `kbd' accepts.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no