[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation of def*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation of def* |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:37:01 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> So, instead of killing the heuristic altogether, why shouldn't
> we adjust it so that it has less false positives? In fact I think
> if we tweak the heuristic to only apply to macro definitions
> it will probably have zero false positives.
Is it possible to override the heuristic with an indentation property
that specifies "treat it like any other function"?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Indentation of def*, (continued)
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/23
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*, João Távora, 2021/10/24
- Re: Indentation of def*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/27
- Re: Indentation of def*, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/27
- Re: Indentation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/30