Re: Entering emojis

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:

> Perhaps we already get what I am about to say below from what you have,
> but given that there are 256 variation selectors, it might be useful to
> have a bigram/trigram model for chars that can meaningfully compose as
> an emoji?

That's not really how the emojis work -- Unicode publishes a document
that says which characters (should) have glyphs for various variations
(mostly in the skin tone/gender area).  The interface lets you navigate
these things.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no