[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:38:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: joakim@verona.se
>> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:55:27 +0200
>>
>> I'm finding it increasingly difficult to build emacs in my distro,
>> Fedora(Ok, I havent managed to build emacs using distro dependencies for
>> a long time)
>
> Why? what are the difficulties?
In my case one of the problems that started the downward spiral was the
versions shipped of gnutls in
fedora which didnt work with emacs.
The separate aproach of building all the dependencies emacs need in a
separate build environment does work, like the Guix aproach.
I could probably convince guix to do what I want, but guix is also
fiddly. I was just wondering if somebody else had a solution for a
reproducible development environment for emacs.
Maybe I'm the only one facing these difficulties, that's fine I guess.
--
Joakim Verona
joakim@verona.se
- Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Pierre Téchoueyres, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuchen Pei, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29