[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:29:50 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:22:39 +0200, joakim@verona.se said:
>> Thatʼs the first Iʼve heard of it. GnuTLS too old, too new, something
else?
joakim> Too new in Fedora(at the time before I threw in the towel at least).
OK. Iʼll guess we'll start seeing reports at some point then.
>> Debian has always worked ok for me. Although I donʼt target
>> reproducible builds.
joakim> Well, I could likely build emacs just fine in a docker container
using
joakim> debian as the base, and run the container in my host fedora os. I
know
joakim> some people do this. This approach is also brittle with how to
manage
joakim> the src tree for development.
I just point my dockers at a local directory, then you donʼt need to worry
about volume persistence.
Robert
--
- Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Pierre Téchoueyres, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuchen Pei, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuri Khan, 2021/10/28
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/28