[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:08:58 +0300 |
> From: joakim@verona.se
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:38:54 +0200
>
> >> I'm finding it increasingly difficult to build emacs in my distro,
> >> Fedora(Ok, I havent managed to build emacs using distro dependencies for
> >> a long time)
> >
> > Why? what are the difficulties?
>
> In my case one of the problems that started the downward spiral was the
> versions shipped of gnutls in
> fedora which didnt work with emacs.
Which version of GnuTLS was that?
And what was the rest of the spiral?
> The separate aproach of building all the dependencies emacs need in a
> separate build environment does work, like the Guix aproach.
I'd say build all the dependencies that aren't already available, yes.
- Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Pierre Téchoueyres, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuchen Pei, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuri Khan, 2021/10/28
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/28
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/30