[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:02:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I'm finding it increasingly difficult to build emacs in my distro,
> Fedora(Ok, I havent managed to build emacs using distro dependencies for
> a long time)
That's a serious problem for Emacs, so please report these as bugs.
I use the kind of "stgit" setup you describe on Debian testing machines
and have none of the problems you describe, so my guess is that Fedora
is a bit more "bleeding edge" and the Emacs code gets adjusted for the
new libs before they reach Debian testing.
Maybe we should have a "bleeding edge Fedora" build VM in EMBA to catch
those problems?
Stefan
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Po Lu, 2021/10/29
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, joakim, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Pierre Téchoueyres, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuchen Pei, 2021/10/28
- Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Yuri Khan, 2021/10/28
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/30
Re: Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2021/10/30