Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs?

[Tassilo Horn]

Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:

>     >> Thatʼs the first Iʼve heard of it. GnuTLS too old, too new, something 
> else?
>
>     joakim> Too new in Fedora(at the time before I threw in the towel at 
> least).
>
> OK. Iʼll guess we'll start seeing reports at some point then.

FWIW, Arch ships with gnutls 3.7.2 which is the most current "next"
release and emacs builds and works just fine with it.  libgnutls-version
reports 30702.

What concretely didn't work with that version?

Bye,
Tassilo