[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Against sqlite3!!!
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Against sqlite3!!! |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2021 21:00:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Engster <deng@randomsample.de> writes:
> Yes, and it's slow. The Gnus registry is saved/loaded this way, and this
> has annoyed me for years.
Yup. The Gnus registry would be well suited to use sqlite directly,
though -- it's basically hand-maintaining a (large) database, and sqlite
is a good fit for that.
That is, I don't think the new normal persistence method would be ideal
for the registry.
But, yes, the Gnus registry is a good demonstration of why serialising
hash tables to disk is unworkable in practice.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Against sqlite3!!!, (continued)
Re: Against sqlite3!!! (Was: sqlite3), Zhu Zihao, 2021/12/07
Re: Against sqlite3!!!, Alexandre Garreau, 2021/12/09
Re: Against sqlite3!!!, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/09
Message not availableRe: Against sqlite3!!!, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/09
Re: Against sqlite3!!!, Thierry Volpiatto, 2021/12/09
Re: Against sqlite3!!!, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/09
Re: Against sqlite3!!!, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/09