Re: Development Speed

[Po Lu]

xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
writes:

> I would say the same, if we were talking about C2X, but would you also
> say the same for C11, which is ten years old? (Well, I originally said
> C17 but on paper they are the same bar a some of fixes.)

That's the case for C11 as well.  I'd say gnu99 and gnu89 are the most
well-tested dialects, IME.