[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 10:55:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> > Over the years, we've managed to reduce the use of macros (replaced by
> > inlinable functions) to some extent, partly thanks to improvement in
> > compilers, but it didn't change much to the code overall.
> Why are inlinable functions superior to macros in regard to ease of
> understanding the code? I don't see how they help.
For example, you don't need to look at the definition of a function to
know how many times and in which context its actual arguments
are evaluated.
Stefan
- Re: Development Speed, (continued)
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/25
- Re: Development Speed, Sean Whitton, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/24
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/23