Re: Plug treesit.el into other emacs constructs

[Theodor Thornhill]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> If this code is plugged into transpose-sexps we get this nice behavior:
>
> It's a bit different from what SMIE would do, but there's a lot of
> overlap and when it's different it's arguably better, so sounds good
> to me.
>

Great!

>> Now forward/backward-sexp can actually work a little differently, as you
>> suggest, or we can let it use the same "move over siblings"-semantic.
>> In that case we don't even need the treesit-sexp-type-regexp variables to
>> control this, I think.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I'm not sufficiently familiar with the tree-sitter tree to foresee
> precisely how it would affect `forward/backward-sexp`, but I think you
> have a good enough understanding to make a good judgment at this
> point :-)

Great. I'll prepare a patch for this behavior, and we can discuss the
forward-* commands after that.

Theo