[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status update of tree-sitter features
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Status update of tree-sitter features |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:28:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> If it's only about calls, maybe call this category funcall?
> Function, property and variable are for every occurrence of them (the touted
> “consistent highlighting”).
In my own use, the difference between a definition and a use is more
important than the difference between a variable name and a method name.
I'm not fundamentally opposed to highlighting funcalls, but it is
indispensable that funcalls get a different face from
function definitions.
Stefan
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, (continued)
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Mickey Petersen, 2022/12/28
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/12/28
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/28
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/12/28
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/29
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/12/29
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/30
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Dmitry Gutov, 2022/12/30
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/31
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/29
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Jostein Kjønigsen, 2022/12/30
- Re: Status update of tree-sitter features, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30