[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:30:44 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> I am not sure what you are referring to here. My point was just that
> features that have to be enabled manually are usually never enabled by
> non-enthusiasts (which I believe are the majority, even for Emacs).
FWIW, I think it's perfectly OK if that's how it plays out in Emacs-29.
That gives us a freer hand to improve the integration in Emacs>29.
Stefan
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, (continued)
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/31
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Richard Stallman, 2022/12/31
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Gregory Heytings, 2022/12/30