[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shrinking the C core
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Shrinking the C core |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:26:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Gerd Möllmann wrote:
>> Okay, but here it isn't about joining the CL standard, it
>> is the situation that we have "the Lisp editor" yet our
>> Lisp is much slower than other people's Lisp, and for no
>> good reason what I can understand as Emacs is C, and SBCL
>> is C. What's the difference, why is one so much faster than
>> the other?
>
> Just wanted to mention that SBCL is not implemented in C.
> It only has a small C runtime containing various GC
> alternatives and hardware/OS dependent stuff.
Ikr? Wise move! Like a real operating system ...
> The rest is Lisp, including bignums and compiler.
C is the fastest we have and SBCL don't even use it, they
don't need it. It is an embarrassment to the sport ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Shrinking the C core, (continued)
Re: Shrinking the C core, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/09
Re: Shrinking the C core, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/13
Re: Shrinking the C core, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/13
- Re: Shrinking the C core,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: Shrinking the C core, Gerd Möllmann, 2023/08/13
Re: Shrinking the C core, Arthur Miller, 2023/08/27
Re: Shrinking the C core, Richard Stallman, 2023/08/27