emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Restore emacs-29.1 eglot behaviour on master


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Restore emacs-29.1 eglot behaviour on master
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:39:40 +0200

> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 07:36:46 +0100
> From: "Pedro A. Aranda" <paaguti@gmail.com>
> 
> Hi
> 
> I've been having massive problems with eglot on master. I understand 
> evolution, being on master, etc. but this is taking too much time now 
> <sigh> and some LSP implementers understand but others don't even react...
> 
> I'm mainly working with Python and LaTeX and this is my eglot config:
> 
>    (setq-default eglot-workspace-configuration
>                  '(:pylsp
>                    (:configurationSources ["pycodestyle"]
>                     :plugins (:autopep8 (:enabled t)
>                               :jedi_completion (:include_params t
>                                                 :eager t
>                                                 :fuzzy :json-false)
>                               :flake8      (:enabled :json-false)
>                               :pylint      (:enabled :json-false)
>                               :pycodestyle (:enabled :json-false)
>                               :pyflakes    (:enabled t)
>                               :mccabe      (:enabled t ;; boolean: true 
> (default) or false
>                                             :threshold 45)))
>                    :texlab
>                    (:completion (:matcher "prefix"))))
> 
> What I have learnt:
> 
> On emacs-29, the section relating to the LSP that is used when on a 
> specific buffer (and only that) is sent tp the LSP. And everything woks 
> as expected
> 
> On emacs-30. the full configuration is sent. That confuses the LSP 
> servers and they start working with the default configuration, which is 
> sometimes of little help.
> 
> Could the original behaviour be (re)implemented in master, please
> 
> Thanks a ton in advance,

João, any comments or suggestions?

Thanks.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]