[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] git useage question
From: |
Jude DaShiell |
Subject: |
Re: [O] git useage question |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:45:05 -0400 (EDT) |
The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of
the simtel archives. Taken down but last I knew not entirely removed from
the internet. On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Jude DaShiell <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Compare that documentation with the documentation written for
> > micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable
> > documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers.
> >
>
> and
>
> > 1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with
> > org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation
> > for git itself.
>
> [was there supposed to be a 2) etc?]
>
> 1) It would have helped if you had said that to begin with: I was left
> wondering what "that" documentation was. And the comparison with the
> micro-emacs doc was entirely impenetrable to me. Can you provide a
> pointer to that doc? Daniel Lawrence's site seems to be gone.
>
> 2) For git, Pieter provided some appropriate links. I'll take the
> opportunity to recommend Scott Chacon's book (http://progit.org/book).
>
> 3) For future reference, here are pointers to a couple of useful
> documents on how to ask questions and how to submit bug reports:
>
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
>
> The first is linked from the main orgmode page (http://orgmode.org);
> the second is linked from the "How to contribute" page on Worg
> (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html). I recommend both of
> these to everybody.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>