[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results
From: |
Christian Moe |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:16:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Fixed, thanks. I should have guessed that might be it.
Evaluating inline calls now works, but there are some ramifications
for output and export that I hadn't thought about when I seconded the
request.
* Export
The call itself should not be exported, but I'm seeing:
: <p>
: Here is a call<sub>square</sub>(it=4) <code>16</code> stuck in the
middle of some prose.
: </p>
* Output
To get rid of the literal equals-signs, I try:
: Here is a call_square(it=4)[:results raw] stuck in the middle of
some prose.
I expect to get the result inline, but instead it comes as a normal
call results block (aligned with the call):
: #+results: square(it=4)
: 16
Yours,
Christian
On 6/27/11 2:14 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
But I seem to have a problem (running your example):
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-function (nonempty (a b) (let
((it (match-string a))) (if (= (length it) 0) (match-string b) it))))
(nonempty (a b) (let (...) (if ... ... it)))()
org-babel-lob-get-info()
org-babel-lob-execute-maybe()
org-babel-execute-maybe()
org-babel-execute-safely-maybe()
run-hook-with-args-until-success(org-babel-execute-safely-maybe)
org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c(nil)
call-interactively(org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c nil nil)
I believe this is due to my forgetting to require 'cl at compile time.
I've just pushed up a fix, please let me know if the problem persists.
Thanks -- Eric
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, (continued)
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Nicolas Goaziou, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, chris . m . malone, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Nicolas Goaziou, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/24
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/24
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/25
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/26
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/26
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results,
Christian Moe <=
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/29