[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:28:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Okay, I've pushed another fix.
>>
>> This let me stumble upon another case: the one with org-schedule and
>> org-deadline ignoring warning cookies -- these cases are also fixed.
>>
>> Please confirm!
>
> Confirmed. There is a peculiar corner case:
>
> If I have a headline that's both scheduled and deadlined, like this:
>
> * scheduled
> DEADLINE: <2011-07-04 Mon +2w -3d>
> SCHEDULED: <2011-07-06 Wed +1w -2d>
>
> and I C-c C-s in the scheduled date, I get a second SCHEDULED: item
> with the new date on the DEADLINE line. The original SCHEDULED: is
> still on the next line, unchanged - like this:
>
> * scheduled
> DEADLINE: <2011-07-04 Mon +2w -3d> SCHEDULED: <2011-07-03 Sun +1w -2d>
> SCHEDULED: <2011-07-06 Wed +1w -2d>
See http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg37987.html where I
report such a case with inactive timestamps and SCHEDULED dates.
See Bastien's answer in the same thread. In this case, SCHEDULED should come
first, before DEADLINE, for it to work.
Note -- I prefer that order (SCHEDULED, then DEADLINE) since dates are then
chronologically sorted (at least, I expect so, that SCHEDULED date < DEADLINE
date)...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, (continued)
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval,
Sebastien Vauban <=
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/29
Re: [O] org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bernt Hansen, 2011/06/24