[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week
From: |
Memnon Anon |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2012 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs
> documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in
> emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case.
The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom".
Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree sometimes :).
,----[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#GFDL ]
| Much documentation written by the GNU Project, the Linux Documentation
| Project and others licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License
| contain invariant sections, which do not comply with the DFSG. This
| assertion is the end result of a long discussion and the General
| Resolution 2006-001.[11]
|
| Due to the GFDL invariant sections, content under this license must be
| separately contained in an additional "non-free" repository which is not
| officially considered part of Debian.
`----
hth
Memnon
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, (continued)
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, SW, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Brian van den Broek, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, SW, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week,
Memnon Anon <=
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, SW, 2012/05/15
- Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/15