[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:39:16 +0100 |
Kyle Meyer <address@hidden> writes:
> Do you prefer to add fixes for the current design, or just move directly
> to merging the two APIs?
The latter sounds better.
>> Also, some comments at the beginning of the library could help.
>>
>> AFAIK, there are no tests for timers. Adding a new "test-timer.el" with
>> a few tests would be nice, if you have some spare time and energy.
>
> Yes, both of those would be good to have, and I'm happy to add them.
>
> Thanks for your comments.
Thank you for your work.
Regards,
- [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Kyle Meyer, 2014/12/03
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/12/03
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Kyle Meyer, 2014/12/03
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Kyle Meyer, 2014/12/07
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/12/09
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/13
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/12/13
- Re: [O] [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for org-timer, Achim Gratz, 2014/12/13