[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Citations, continued
From: |
Erik Hetzner |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Citations, continued |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:58:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/25.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 at 07:59:46 PST,
Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Erik Hetzner <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> The ideal would be if citeproc would take care of proper formatting
> >> of all such citation types, given just an ordered list of the fields
> >> that should appear. I don't know if CSL supports this, though; do
> >> you?
> >
> > I’m not entirely sure what you mean. The authors of citeproc have come
> > up with a huge number of styles which seem to satisfy people’s needs.
> > What appears in the in-text citation is configurable, see:
> >
> >
> > http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification-csl101-20120903.html#citation
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear. What I mean is, is there a way to tell an
> implementation of CSL "hey, this particular citation right here should
> only contain the author (or year, or journal...) of the referenced work,
> even though the citation style for this document is (e.g.) numeric?"
>
> The link you referenced makes it seem like the <citation> element
> describes how citations should be formatted for a whole document, but
> maybe I don't understand it. (Can there be multiple citation formatting
> styles specified by a CSL stylesheet? or multiple stylesheets used to
> format the citations in a document?)
>
> The idea is, a citation like "As Doe says in @Doe99:title, ..." should
> render like "As Doe says in /The Title/, ...", not like "As Doe says in
> Doe (1999), ...", even if "@Doe99" citations in the document generally
> render like the latter. I suspect this must be possible with
> citeproc/CSL, but I don't actually know, since Pandoc doesn't provide
> syntax for this kind of case.
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the reply. I believe there is some discussion of this here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pandoc-discuss/QcAnk7hsZD8/e9MYHu0BA5IJ
and probably elsewhere on the pandoc-discuss list if you search the
archives.
It’s not supported in existing citeproc implementations, but I think
it would be possible to support something like this. On the other
hand, this is also something that is easily done by hand, so I don’t
know if it’s worth the trouble.
best, Erik
--
Sent from my free software system <http://fsf.org/>.
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, (continued)
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Thomas S. Dye, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Thomas S. Dye, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/06
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/06
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Erik Hetzner, 2015/02/04
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/04
- Re: [O] Citations, continued,
Erik Hetzner <=
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Richard Lawrence, 2015/02/04