[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Citations, continued
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Citations, continued |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:02:32 +0100 |
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
> PS: Here's a quick link "proof-of-concept" (not really) with biblatex
> only, and cite it textcitation. Documents with this type of syntax are
> indeed pleasant to the eye.
>
> [[cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2]]
As pointed out already, the double square bracket is not needed, and can
introduce ambiguity with links.
I'm fine with
[cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2]
but how do you distinguish between in-text and in-parenthesis?
Also, how do you extract year or journal from the key (since you
suggested these features in the first place)?
Regards,
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, (continued)
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/09
- Re: [O] Citations, continued,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/08
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, John Kitchin, 2015/02/09
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Andreas Leha, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, John Kitchin, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, Rasmus, 2015/02/10
- Re: [O] Citations, continued, John Kitchin, 2015/02/10