[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Why not push?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Why not push? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:56:01 +0100 |
On 2015-02-15, at 11:42, Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
>>> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
>>> construction:
>>>
>>> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>>>
>>> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
>>
>> No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;)
>
> Shhh... if you don't say anything, he might go and do it!
;-)
Actually, not. (Though it might make a nice student project. And it
would be a good idea to do it.) But I haven't signed the FSF papers.
OTOH, I have a personal project where I devote some amount of time every
day to read someone else's code. I started with parts of simple.el, and
now the time has come for ox-latex (and its dependencies).
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
Re: [O] Why not push?, Rasmus, 2015/02/15
Re: [O] Why not push?, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/02/16