|
From: | Cook, Malcolm |
Subject: | Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed? |
Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:56:39 +0000 |
Hi, Coming late to this fray and responding to original Subject If you (require 'use-package) Then you might find the following to work, as I do: (use-package org :ensure org-plus-contrib ; following
http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/7890/org-plus-contrib-and-org-with-require-or-use-package ;; .. etc ) YMMV, Malcolm From: Emacs-orgmode [mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+address@hidden
On Behalf Of Kaushal Modi Hi all, I just discovered a bug in this advice that I suggested earlier in this thread.. I needed to fix the order of packages in the new-ret list that is returned. The bug was that the order of pkgs in new-ret was flipped compared to that in orig-ret..
so I needed to flip it back using reverse.
(defun modi/package-dependency-check-ignore (orig-ret) "Remove the `black listed packages' from ORIG-RET. Packages listed in the let-bound `pkg-black-list' will not be auto-installed even if they are found as dependencies. It is known that this advice is not effective when installed packages asynchronously using `paradox'. Below is effective on synchronous package installations." (let ((pkg-black-list '(org)) new-ret pkg-name) (dolist (pkg-struct orig-ret) (setq pkg-name (package-desc-name pkg-struct)) (if (member pkg-name pkg-black-list) (message (concat "Package `%s' will not be installed. " "See `modi/package-dependency-check-ignore'.") pkg-name) (push pkg-struct new-ret))) ;; Tue Apr 11 17:48:16 EDT 2017 - kmodi ;; It's *very* critical that the order of packages stays the same in NEW-RET ;; as in ORIG-RET. The `push' command flips the order, so use `reverse' ;; to flip the order back to the original. ;; Without this step, you will get errors like below when installing ;; packages with dependencies: ;; Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Unable to activate package ‘nim-mode’. ;; Required package ‘flycheck-28’ is unavailable") (setq new-ret (reverse new-ret)) new-ret)) (advice-add 'package-compute-transaction :filter-return #'modi/package-dependency-check-ignore) On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:28 AM Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
-- Kaushal Modi |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |