[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:24:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't understand. C-c C-, combination is as fast as Org Tempo:
>
> C-c C-, s : 3 keys
> < s TAB : 3 keys
I'm tempted to count the number of fingers involved ;)
Which may not be *that* stupid when considering "fast" typing.
But eh, I don't want vimers to come and laugh at us.
> We could even add an "expert" interface that would not display the
> help menu for an even faster C-c C-, experience.
That's a good idea, yes. I can even imagine that M-TAB can expand <*
using org-insert-structure-template only, and they we don't have the
problem of requiring this problematic tempo library.
>> M-x customize-option RET org-modules seems okay to me.
>
> Then you may belong to the happy few that happen to find Customize
> interface "okay". :>
Well, no, I'm not one of these happy few...
> I was speaking about "init.el" hacking. One must be cautious when
> setting Org modules: it requires to be set before Org is loaded.
Ok, fair point.
> Also, my question is still open: is there any strong reason to provide,
> out of the box, two template mechanisms in Org? This is genuine
> question.
No, there is no good reason for two template mechanism, and if we can
rely on org-insert-structure-template only, while still being able to
complete <* at the beginning of the line, that'd be perfect to me.
> In any case, I don't think it is just a matter of personal preference,
> like defcustoms. There should be some clear design decision behind the
> answer.
I get your point. What would you think of this idea: (1) only one
function for inserting templates, but callable in two different ways,
one interactive (C-c C-, possibly with expert mode) and one by just
typing and hitting M-TAB.
In a word: I just want to add a simpler completion mechanism to the
current template insertion mechanism. If we can get rid of org-tempo
from Org's core, that's even better.
> Let's un-bundle this issue from the rest of the poll, and think
> about it separately.
Agreed.
> Hmmmm. This is another topic.
Yes, let's raise this issue later on.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
- Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4, (continued)
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/02/19
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4, Tim Cross, 2020/02/19
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4, AW, 2020/02/19
Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4, Matthew Lundin, 2020/02/19