[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'.
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'. |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2022 14:14:05 +0800 |
Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> writes:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Mark function obsolete & fix spelling of its
>>> name
>>
>>This commit message is a bit confusing. I would mention the
>>function
>>name: "Mark `org-truely-invisible-p' obsolete and fix spelling of
>>its
>>name"
>
> It does mention both names :-). But I'm happy to rewrite in the
> style you suggest above; I was just trying to follow the
> CONTRIBUTE guidelines.
Sorry for not being clear. I was referring to the commit message - it is
what you commonly see in git log.
Having something like
>>> commit-hash Mark function obsolete & fix spelling of its name
in git log is confusing because it is unclear what the commit is
changing. If you look at
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/log/
then you can see that we generally follow certain style of the
commit messages: changed-file-or-library: What is changed
Also see https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#commit-messages
>>It is too much.
>>We can either
>>1. Obsolete org-truely-invisible-p. Then, there is not much point
>> renaming it.
>>2. Rename it without obsoletion. Then, there is not much point
>>moving
>> the function definition to org-compat.
>
> Hmm. From the prior conversation in this thread, I thought we'd
> decided to do both. There are two separate issues here:
>
> 1) The function is no longer used in Org Mode or Emacs.
>
> 2) Unrelatedly, the function's name has a misspelling.
>
> (1) suggests that the function should be moved to 'org-compat.el'
> (if I understand correctly what that file is for).
>
> (2) is usually fixed with a rename and a compatibility alias --
> i.e., this is what we would do for any function, whether used or
> unused.
>
> In your message 87h7b5rm6f.fsf@localhost of 19 Dec 2021, you
> wrote:
>
>>I feel slightly reluctant about removal. If nothing, this
>>function can
>>be a reminder about visible-mode and keeping it has little
>>downside.
>>Though if others think that removing would be better, I would
>>also be
>>fine with it.
>>
>>Renaming sounds reasonable. Just need to define obsolete alias
>>for the
>>old name in org-compat.el.
>
> My patch was based on the above, and on the fact that obsolete
> (i.e., unused) functions apparently get moved to org-compat.el, at
> least based on what I see already in that file.
I think we have a misunderstanding here. Unused functions are not
necessarily obsolete. For example, we have org-list-to-texinfo, which is
not used anywhere in the codebase, but could be useful for developers.
org-compat.el contains functions that are planned for removal in future
(and obsolete for the time being), obsolete function/variable names, and
compatibility functions.
As I mentioned in my previous email, I am slightly reluctant to remove
org-truely-invisible-p. It means that it should remain available and no
plans to remove it should be made (unless there are multiple devs/users
who prefer removal). Hence, the function should stay in org-macs.el.
org-macs.el is meant to store general-purpose functions that can be
useful for development of the whole Org mode ecosystem.
If we decide that org-truely-invisible-p stays in org-macs, we should
fix the issue with its name. Renaming requires creating obsolete
function name alias in org-compat.el to make sure that nothing gets
broken unexpectedly for people who use org-truely-invisible-p with its
current name.
Hope I clarified my logic.
>>> From: Ihor Radchenko
>>> Subject: Re: Removing obsolete function
>>> `org-truely-invisible-p'.
>>> To: Karl Fogel
>>> Cc: Org Mode
>>> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:14:32 +0800
>>> Message-ID: <87h7b5rm6f.fsf@localhost>
>>
>>I usually just leave an ML link in such cases:
>>https://orgmode.org/list/87h7b5rm6f.fsf@localhost
>
> As long as the ML link contains the Message-ID, as appears to be
> the case here, yeah. Mailing list archives can move, which causes
> links to suddenly stop working. But if the Message-ID is in the
> link, then (with a little extra work) one can always find the
> message in the new archive.
>
> (The reason I typically include more is to make things as easy as
> possible for those who are searching in a local archive using
> their regular mailreader. But I can switch to the above way if
> you'd prefer.)
FYI, I do not know an easy way to search mailing list archives by
Message-ID. Message-ID itself does not even provide information which
mailing list it is referring to (maybe it is e.g. Emacs devel).
That's why I prefer links - they can often be found using archive.org if
nothing.
On the other hand, extra information would not heart. In addition to
link.
Best,
Ihor
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'., Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/04
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'., Karl Fogel, 2022/04/04
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'.,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Linking by Message-ID, Max Nikulin, 2022/04/05
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'., Karl Fogel, 2022/04/05
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'., Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/07
- Re: Removing obsolete function `org-truely-invisible-p'., Karl Fogel, 2022/04/07
- [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/15
- Re: [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Robert Pluim, 2022/04/15
- Re: [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Karl Fogel, 2022/04/15
- Re: [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/16
- Re: [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/23
- Re: [PATCH] CONTRIBUTE: Link WORG page when explaining commit message format, Karl Fogel, 2022/04/23