[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el.
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2003 00:53:46 -0400 |
The way lm-commentary now
determines the end of the commentary section is not very robust,
though. It depends on the presence of a ChangeLog/History or Code
header.
That's ok--if the file fails to have another section header to end the
Commentary section, that is a bug in the file.
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., (continued)
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Richard Stallman, 2003/05/16
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/16
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Richard Stallman, 2003/05/18
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/16
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/17
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Richard Stallman, 2003/05/18
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el., Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/18
- Re: Spell checking of the commentary section by checkdoc.el.,
Richard Stallman <=