[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Holidays in fancy diary
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: Holidays in fancy diary |
Date: |
05 Feb 2004 08:59:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Ed Reingold <address@hidden> writes:
> > Ed Reingold <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > Richard--whoever made these changes is an ass who does not know what
> > > he or she is doing.
> >
> > Calm down. It looks like the only problem with that change is that it
> > causes the macro to return nil, doesn't it? We can fix that without
> > reintroducing the bug that the changes were designed to fix.
>
> No!!! The change mucks about with the BC/AD change which is irrelevant and
> wrong. It needs to be AS IT WAS.
Perhaps you should add some comments somewhere explaining why the
BC/AD change should be as it was, because it certainly looks like the
previous code did not take into account that there was no year 0, so I
am not surprised someone thought it was a bug and fixed it.
- Holidays in fancy diary, Matthew Mundell, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Ed Reingold, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Matthew Mundell, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Ed Reingold, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Ed Reingold, 2004/02/04
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Ed Reingold, 2004/02/05
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Glenn Morris, 2004/02/06
- Re: Holidays in fancy diary, Ed Reingold, 2004/02/04