[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil |
Date: |
29 Mar 2004 16:21:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> Maybe a message could warn the user what happened. So if it DWIM in
> 95% of all cases, and undo fixes the remainng 5%, I think users will
> quickly adapt...
> first undo => undo reformatting, second undo => undo yank.
> I guess we could try that.
Apart from the message (which my code did not have), this is exactly what
my code used to do (with the old broken yank-handler code).
I'll try to fix it.
Stefan
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, (continued)
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/25