Re: `file-relative-name' for compressed files

[Kai Grossjohann]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> I suggested another alternative which is cleaner than either of these,
> if it works:
>
>    Perhaps making the file-remote-p operation
>  return more information is the way to do it.  For instance, it could
>  return the "remote part" of the file name.
>
> Could you please see if you can solve it that way?

Thanks for your patience.  It took me a long time to finally
understand what you meant.

I've now written the solution and will work on checking it in.  As
you suggested, it seems clean.

Kai