[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3 |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:23:07 -0700 |
It turns out that contrary to what I previously said, the size of
"pure" can be decreased a lot, to 994000
bytes (at least on i686-pc-linux-gnu).
The only user of the "PURESIZE" computation in puresize.h is alloc.c, so
it might be a good idea to move all those definitions to alloc.c so
that spurious recompilations are avoided when changing the size of
pure.
- size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/10
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15