[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:31:50 +1300 |
> > ~/emacs/src/emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte --eval
> > "(batch-byte-recompile-directory 0)" ~/test
> >
> > Checking /home/nick/test...
> > Compiling /home/nick/test/file.el...
> > ...
> >
> > A file loaded for the compilation of file1.el, still appears to be loaded
> > for
> > the compilation of file2.el.
>
> That's why `make compile' doesn't do that and compiles .els
> separately. (I have a more efficient version that doesn't always run
> emacs on most of the Lisp files and is rather more usable on an old
> box.)
OK. I didn't realise that. My example was for `make recompile'. Why aren't
the .els compiled separately in this case also?
Nick
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, (continued)
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/15
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/19
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/20
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22