[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: case-table functions clobbering extra slots

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: case-table functions clobbering extra slots
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:28:47 -0500

    0149; 0149; 02BC 004E; 02BC 004E; # LATIN SMALL LETTER N PRECEDED BY 

    As 0149 has no uppercase precomposed character, Unicode
    represents it by the sequence of 02BC (MODIFIER LETTER
    APOSTROPHE) and 004E ('N') (incredibly bad design).

    Then, how should we downcase this sequence?  To 0149 or to

Suppose it always results in 0149.  Would that be bad?
Is there any case in which the only correct result
is 02BC, 'n'?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]