[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3 |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:30:38 -0500 |
Myabe this is what Emacs should do, create a pixmap, do its drawing
there, and then XCopyArea it to the window when done.
Why do you think Emacs should do this? What benefit would it provide?
I can't see any.
(In any case, this isn't the time to make such a change.)
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, (continued)
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/13
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/12
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/13
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/13
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/13
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/12
Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/10