emacs-pretest-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx


From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:09:53 +0900 (JST)
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>>  \glq, \glqq, ... are defined in the babel LaTeX package (see "texdoc
>>  babel", table 4 or babel/babel.def and babel/*.ldf).  

> Ah, that explains why I couldn't find them under texmf/tex/latex --
> it's years since I looked at Babel.

Does it mean that we don't have to change those lines in
latin-ltx.el?

And, what to do with the followings?  Doesn't babel table
contain mnemonics for them?

> I'd also like these added.  Some are alternative names for characters
> which are already present.  Some of the names aren't in standard LaTeX
> but come from the ISO standard for Z.

> \texttrademark ™
> \textquoteright ’
> \textquoteleft ‘
> \dots …
> \nat ℕ
> \power ℙ
> \textquotedblleft “
> \textquotedblright ”
> \ndres ⩤
> \nrres ⩥
> \cent ¢
> \brokenvert ¦
> \degree °
> \rbbbrack ⟦
> \lbbbrack ⟧

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]