[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc for defface does not mention new "default" condition
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Doc for defface does not mention new "default" condition |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:26:55 +0900 |
On 4/13/05, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Deep down in "face-spec-choose" we have this:
>
> ;; If the condition is `default', that sets the default
> ;; for following conditions.
> (if (eq display 'default)
> (setq defaults thisval)
Hmmm, so _that's_ how things work these days... I remember there was a
bit of an argument about this topic a while back.
So is it basically: straight cond-style structure (albeit unevaluated
tests), first matching clause is chosen exclusively, _except_ that a
"default" clause sets the defaults and continues searching as above?
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.